Capitalist and Social Democracies & Cause Effect Relationship Essay Example for Free

Capita come and Social Democracies ca-ca Effect Relationship EssayQuality of LifeThe psychea of living of dry land has always been the most important concern of any of the economic as closely as the governmental theories. And there engage been a number of parameters that are required to be looked upon so that racing shell of life of a nation butt be explained on a broader scale. Technical m cardinaltary terms manage GDP per person are actually(prenominal) much materialistic in sign and hence cannot be considered as a sufficient parameter to indicate the current status of the nations fiber of life. Some of the literatures view made recogniz qualified adjustments in GDP factor in by quantifying other important facets that are left behind speckle considering GDP measure.The other considerable non marketplace activities are affectionate ills, environmental pollution and many others. But this approach has its own difficulties because it requires the assignmen t of quantitative or monetary look upons to the sundry(a) factors that constitute of a wider measure of socio-economic wellbeing and hence a number of processes have been developed to flesh kayoed a conclusive remark related to the flavor of life while depending on a number of factors that make way for the proposed conclusion. The main purpose of every the attempts has been to make out a list of variables that can be considered as a determinant of fiber of life.These measures have nethergone a number of selection biases and there have been corresponding arbitrariness in those factors which have been chosen to access tint of life. The indicators that set up those factors have been assigned weights so that a single opinionated measure could be achieved. The GDP has its own substantive purpose and despite all its shortcomings it has sufficiently been able to depict clear meaning to the prices that have objective weights for the goods and services that make it up.The proposal suggests that the quality of life can be considered as an issue depending on nine different factors. The factors and the indicators that are used to represent those factors are1. Material wellbeing It depicts the ordinary GDP of a nation i.e., GDP per person or per capita income. Indicator for this factor has been GDP per person, at PPP in $. It quantifies the very material or average prosperity of the nation. This material well-being is also very sizeableness in enabling elderly concourse especially senior citizens to retain their independence in later life.2. Health This factor has its importance while quantifies the physical as well as mental health of the people. Indicators for this factor are life foresight at birth and the average age of both young-begetting(prenominal) and female.3. Political perceptual constancy and security The boilers suit development and policy of a nation is a multiple of this factor. The untaught is being provided ratings while depending on o ne of the nation as both(prenominal) base.4. Family life The restrict of a family on an average is an attribute of family life of the nation. The divorce prises are being stipulation the status of indicator for quantifying this factor. The divorce govern per 1,000 populations is being converted into index number of 1 to 5 with increasing number showing negative trend.5. friendship Life A factor with set 0 or 1. The null value corresponds lower sideline of common public in society life while 1 being assigned to those countries where community life often takes place in devise public gathering both at church or trade meetings.6. Climate and geography This factor is being indicated through latitude values word picture warmer and colder climatic conditions of the nation.7. Job Security This factor is self explanatory and is being indicated through unemployment rate expressed in percentage.8. Political Freedom A mean to represent the condition of political and elegant libe rties with values ranging from 1 to 7 where 1 depicts completely free environment while 7 is provided to an besides closed political condition .9. Gender Equality A very crucial social factor for the quantification of male and female social, economic and financial status with indicator being the ratio of average male and female earnings.The preceding(prenominal) mentioned variables cover a very broad range of areas that can affect the quality of life of a nation. There a number of other variables that can also affect this quality of life like the upbringing levels, the rate of actual GDP growth and income disagreement.But in real sense this education level is little correlation between education and life satisfaction and this education level later decides income and finally health. But at the same time, this wellbeing has been found to get under negative influence in case of the job being poorly attuned to academic background of the person as well as its needs and aspirations. Hence this sophisticated tests being done over the above mentioned variables has strong correlation with simple measure of life satisfaction with considerations of both individual and behavioral measures.Cause and effect psychoanalysisThe Quality of life has been considered as the function with variables falling in near half-dozen different domains. Under Material Wellbeing, the variables have been none other than the GDP and PPP. These factors are the very priming behind higher state of Material wellbeing. The value of GDP is actually aggregate marketed income of a uncouth and at the same time depicts quaternary different components that measure up to depict well being. The four components are effective per capita consumption flows, net societal accumulation of stocks of productive resources, income distribution poverty and in par and finally economic insecurity.Health is another domain. The variables that fall under this category are life presentiment at birth i.e., infant mortality and average age. It can be indexed as physical quality-of-life index thereby attempting to measure the quality of life or well being of a nation. The numeric value of the factors associated with it is derived from infant mortality, life expectancy and average age with values ranging from 0 to 100.Family and community is a very important factor which relates the internal condition of a family as well its social starticipation as an indicator of condition at the level of smallest unit level. The indicators for the quantification of this factor are divorce rate, gender comparison and social gathering. Divorce rate is measured per 1000 families while the values related to gender equality and social gathering are decided on arbitrary pattern after comparing the entropy with some standard nation.Figure (Fishbone diagram for cause and effect synopsis Quality of life)Political Stability is another extra personal factor which has its own impact. The countrys political conditio n is a sharp reflection of what policies does the country takes for boosting social and political stability. The better the political condition the better leave alone be the future direction. Every thing right from security, independence, development as well as country and its peoples future direction in terms of financial gain and income depends on the political condition. The indicators for the political scenario of a nation are stability, security, freedom etc. which are assigned some value according to the some established norms or airula.Environment is another factor which has a deciding importance in countrys quality of living. The climate and geography are the indicators which are assigned some value play as variable while determining the quality of life. If we look at the list of nations in between Tropic of Cancer and Tropic of Capricorn, the climatic condition over the region is almost the same and at the same time, almost all of the nations in this particular area are either developing or under developed. Hence the geography and climate has its own impact of quality of life. apart from all the above mentioned factors, some auxiliary factors are also equally valuable. Job security and rising prices are some of the few such indicators fashioning an impact on quality of life.Social Democracy, capitalist Democracy quality of lifeNations democratic condition is very much answerable in causing any effect on factors that make way for defining the quality of life. The material well which is indicated by the GDP and PPP is considered to perform strongly in a capital country if compared with social democracy. Now more money volition get translated into better spending in health vex and hence indicators like life expectancy and average life should be evaluate to be of higher order in case of capitalist democracy but the ground situation is very much different.The worlds biggest capitalist democracy i.e., US has reformed its welfare programs in the category 1996 but the new provisions in the welfare act failed to provide both health and social benefits to under privileged. The health inequality is at its peak. Despite being one of the biggest spenders in health sector, its transaction on health care index is much less than other OECD nations but the personal care policy that has been followed in social economy of United Kingdom and Ireland has helped in giving better results like prolonging life expectancy.The deuce types of democracies have different philosophies on issues like political freedom, justice and social security. The thought process for the development of next generation is to make way for equality of political and economic participation and at the same time basic chances of life for social justice expanded from legal and material preconditions for freedom and equal rights to equal dignity.Political freedom has to be expanded from self determination of government to the pickings charge of own life. Capitalist democracy has defined equal opportunity as providing uniformity in life but social democracy expands it to create space for developing personal predilections and talents. The different approaches for the factors in case of social and capital democracies have made way for separate behavior of the same indicators in determining the performance of the nations on quality of life index.Subject for studyThe purpose of the proposed paper is to figure out relationship between above mentioned indicators and the quality of life in two different environments with one being capital democracy while the other one being social democracy. The democratic condition of a nation defines the very state of its people and their way of living. The points which have to be figured out in the study of the subject is the effect of the two type of democracies on each of the indicators and then how these changes testament cause the change in quality of life of the nation and its people.MeasurementEach of the in dicators has to be given some numeric value. These values are assigned on specific formulas and techniques that will either be in accordance with those used by UN or if necessary new formulas will be developed. The quality of life is the output function with final value being proportional to the values of the indicators.Data line of battle MethodsThe next step is that of info collection. The data which has to be used for analysis is more of secondary in nature with most of them being categorized into three basic types. Documentary with material in form written text or non written materials. Multiple Source area based sources which are basically local journals and country exploration. Survey public surveys while taking each and every class into account. It can be censuses or ad-hoc surveysThe above mentioned types of secondary information have to be extracted from books, journal articles, newspapers magazines, conference papers, UN reports, archives, electronic database, inter net, etc. The majority of the data will get utilized in figuring out a complete literature review with information gathered would give details of different indicators of quality of life, factors affecting those indicators and how are these going to behave in case of the two democracies that has been considered for discussion. In the present research we will generally lean on secondary data and the surveys will have to be done in two nations. For Capitalist democracy, United States of America has to be explored while for Social democracy, Ireland has been taken as case study. The details of a public survey can be taken from the surveys of United Nation and other reliable sources and the same could be used for the analysis in this case.AnalysisThe data obtained through the various methods discussed above would be either quantitative or qualitative. Since the research requires interpretation of data that is likely to be enormous is quantity with proper statistical analysis. Quantitati ve analysis of the data is more likely to be secondary and exploratory in nature requiring proper summarising. The data that has been obtained through survey would mostly be categorical and will require proper scale based ranking.Qualitative analysis of data is expected to be used more if it is being compared with quantitative analysis. It will require quantification up to certain detail but an overall non-quantifying method is more likely to be used through the data analysis and interpretation process and finally comparison of the final output. This would begin with categorisation according to possible unitisation, making out relations and then developing categories to facilitate it, and developing and testing hypotheses to reach conclusion.ScheduleThe entire process has to be divided into a number of phases. The first phase is the analysis of the research hassle according to the theoretical framework. The maximum required time for first phase analysis is one week. The outcome of this analysis will decide the type of data to be arranged or searched for full bring up analysis. The data search is mainly secondary in nature and the sources for the same are in the form of documentary, journals, research paper and surveys. The important thing is source reliability. There has to be at least two mid term analysis so that quality of the collected data that has been collected so far can be checked.The schedule for the whole project is as followsObject Statement Analysis 1 weekData assay (First phase) 3 weeksData Analysis (Mid term) 1 weekData Search (Second phase) 3 weeksData Analysis (Mid term) 1 weekData Search (Third phase) 3 weeksData Analysis (Final) 3 weeksReport Documentation 1 weekTotal 16 weeksBudgetThe main part of the total expenditure is in making this project will get utilized in data collection. Since the data collection is basically secondary in nature and most of them are freely operational so the actual cost to be incurred in the same is in tune of $1000-$1500. So the maximum possible budgetary requirement is around $1500.ConclusionThe final report project will have the following format1. Title2. Research Question3. Literature Review4. Research Methodology5. abstract Framework6. Primary Research7. Analysis8. Findings9. Conclusions Recommendations10. ReferencesReferencesNational Governors Association (2005), A National Health dread Innovations Program Aproposal to increase the cost-effectiveness and quality of the U.S. health care system.U. S. Department of Health and gracious Resources (2003), Steps to a Healthier US AProgram and Policy Perspective. The Power of Prevention.European lookout on Health Care Systems (1999), Health Care Systemsin Transition United Kingdom, WHO Regional Office, Europe.Osberg, L. Sharpel, A., Comparisons of Trends in GDP and Economic Well-being the Impact of Social CapitalHuo, J, Nelson, M. Stephens, J. (2006) Decommodification and Activation in Social republican Policy Resolv ing the ParadoxNueva Sociedad (2007) Social Democracy in the 21st CenturyEconomist tidings Unit (2005) Quality-of-life index The Economist Intelligence Units quality-of-life Index Online Available from http//www.economist.com/media/pdf/QUALITY_OF_LIFE.pdfCampbell, A., Phil C., Rodgers, W. (1976). The Quality of American Life. New York Russell Sage Foundation.Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Seidlitz, L. Diener, M. (1993) The Relationship Between Income and Subjective Well Being Relative or sheer(a)? Social Indicators Research.Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton Princeton University Press.Frey, B. S. and Alois S.( 2002). Happiness and Economics. Princeton, NJ Princeton Univeristy Press.Elazar, D. (1984). American Federalism A view from the states. New York doubting ThomasCrowell.