Different Views Of Human Nature - 1496 Words

The brain is believed to involve two different views of human nature, the first states that it is a flexible organ that adapts in order to gain new information. The second view indicates that the it is formed by evolution in order to learn to perform different functions (Splleke, 2007) This essay will aim to understand these views by discussing and comparing Spllekes (2007) ‘core knowledge’ theory, and Gopniks (2004) ‘The scientist in the crib’ theory, the two main modern approaches to developmental cognitive psychology. Splleke and Kinzer s (2007) theory states that infants have an understanding of objects, and are able to interoperate their environment. They claimed that infants also have an understanding of the basic domains of cognition, such as: Numbers, objects, action and space (Goswami, 2003). In contrast to this, Gopnik (2004) theorised that children think like scientists, introducing her ‘scientist in the crib’ theory, which is also known as the ‘theory theory’. This theory states that children observe the statistics and hypothesis of their environment, and by doing so they understand the emotions and behaviours of other individuals. Splleke (2007) states that children’s knowledge is innate. She introduced the idea of four core knowledge systems: object recognition, representation of agents and their actions, a core number system and a system of representing environmental geometry. The system that is the most widely recognised is object recognition, this ide aShow MoreRelatedThe Political Theories Of Machiavelli, Niccolo Machiavelli And Thomas Hobbes1456 Words   |  6 Pagesbeginning of history in order to provide organization for society. These theories stem from the different views of human nature, which is what people are fundamentally like. In order for a political theory to function in a certain society, it needs to understand how people think and act. Three prominent political theorists were Aristotle, Niccolo Machiavelli, and Thomas Hobbes. Aristotle viewed humans as natural â€Å"political animals† that have both rational and irrational sides to them, allowing forRead MoreHow Literature Can Promote Social Change And Personal Acceptance1416 Words   |  6 Pagesthe imagery, which stems from their very different worldviews. Browning seems to be discontent but hopeful for a better world while Baudelaire is far more pessimistic and provides little hope to his readers. This reveals the biases through which these two authors view the world. These biases also filter into their writing, enabling them to reach different messages and purposes despite the fact that they use similar writing techniques. Through the use of nature-based and religious imagery, BaudelaireRead MoreCompare and Contrast Hobbes’s and Locke’s Views of the State of Nature and the Fundamental Purpose of Political Society. Whose View Is the More Plausible? Why?1564 Words   |  7 Pagescontrast Hobbes’s and Locke’s views of the state of nature and the fundamental purpose of political society. Whose view is the more plausible? Why? Introduction Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were both natural law theorists and social contracts theorists. While most natural law theorists have predominantly been of the opinion that humans are social animals by nature, Locke and Hobbes had a different perspective. Their points of view were remarkably different from those perpetuated by otherRead MoreThe New Technology Can Save Lives960 Words   |  4 Pagesstates, â€Å"Somatic gene therapy is, in other words, much like medicine† (9). McKibben and Kurzweil have different views on what is acceptable when using this technology to help save lives. Somatic gene therapy and germline engineering are misused according to McKibben if they increase performance of the individual, while Kurzweil thinks anything is acceptable when it increases performance of the human species. Another thing that both Kurzweil and McKibben believe is that people will accept this new technologyRead MoreDifferent Viewpoints on Human Nature Essay520 Words   |  3 Pag esDifferent Viewpoints on Human Nature Throughout history there have been arguments about anything and everything that is disagreeable. People innately have there own and often different opinions. A prominent discussion topic throughout history has been the nature of mankind. Many have written works about human nature but few are discussed in greater detail than Candide, The Prince, and Essay on Man. Voltaire, Niccolo Machiavelli, and Alexander Pope, who wrote these three works respectively, concurRead MoreExamples Of Human Nature In The Tempest740 Words   |  3 PagesHuman nature is best described as how humans act in their most raw, untouched state. It describes the natural state of man before he is corrupted by society. Every person, every book, expresses a different view of what common characteristics unite mankind. The Tempest by William Shakespeare puts forth a very positive view of human nature. It shows human nature as very compassionate and caring. What changes a person from their natural state is society . Therefore, Miranda, who has had no contactRead MoreThe Philosophies Are Confucianism, Mohism And Legalism1497 Words   |  6 Pagesand philosophy have been argued upon throughout history. Philosophers and religious leaders have opposing views about how society should behave and be controlled. Just as there are many different religions, there are also many different philosophies each with their own idea about how society should behave and governments should rule. Each philosophy also has a different opinion of human nature. Chinese philosophy began in the fifth century BC with Confucius and changed and evolved as other philosophersRead MoreHannah Arendt And Hannah Arendts View Of Human Happiness1193 Words   |  5 Pagesabout what human happiness is and how it can be attained. Thomas Hobbes, an English philosopher, believes that happiness is attained simply by acquiring the things that one desires. On the contrary, Hannah Arendt, a German-born American theorist, claims that happ iness is attained through self-expressive speech. While both philosopher’s theories hold some degree of truth, Arendt’s view of human nature and human happiness is more ‘realistic’ because her theory more accurately describes human behaviorRead MoreHobbes And Rousseau s View Of State Of Nature1486 Words   |  6 PagesFor centuries, many political philosophers used â€Å"state of nature† as the starting point of their theories about society, chief among them Hobbes and Rousseau. Even though both philosophers saw state of nature as the phase prior to formation of societies, Hobbes saw the state of nature as a step to the better phase (a political society ruled by sovereign), while Rousseau saw it as a step to man’s misery. For Hobbes, man’s natural state is fearful and chaotic phase which create the need for an institutionRead MoreFreud vs. Rogers: the Theory of Personality Essay example996 Words   |  4 Pagesevidence, and expertise . Some views they shared, others they did not. However, both psychologists theorized that people have a ‘hidden personality within them, one which they are not aware of. Although both theories were developed through many years of clinical experience, they are each based on their own, inherently different assumptions; although both theories include a ‘hidden personality, the concept of human nature and the role it plays in the rationale behind human motivation are diametrically